
Error Correction 1
contributed
Mon, 26 Jan 2026, 15:30 - 15:30
- Continuous-Variable Quantum MacWilliams IdentitiesAnsgar G. Burchards (Freie Universität Berlin)[abstract]Abstract: We derive bounds on general continuous-variable quantum error correcting codes against the displacement noise channel. The bounds limit the distances attainable by codes and also apply in an approximate setting. Our main result is a quantum analogue of the classical Cohn-Elkies bound on sphere packing densities attainable in Euclidean space. We further derive a quantum version of Levenshtein's sphere packing bound and argue that Gottesman--Kitaev--Preskill (GKP) codes based on the $E_8$ and Leech lattices achieve optimal distances. The main technical tool is a continuous-variable version of the quantum MacWilliams identities, which we introduce. The identities relate a pair of weight distributions which can be obtained for any two trace-class operators. General properties of these weight distributions are discussed, along with several examples.
- Haar random codes attain the quantum Hamming bound, approximatelyFermi Ma (UC Berkeley); Xinyu Tan (MIT); John Wright (UC Berkeley)[abstract]Abstract: We study the error correcting properties of Haar random codes, in which a $K$-dimensional code space $\bC \subseteq \C^N$ is chosen at random from the Haar distribution. Our main result is that Haar random codes can approximately correct errors up to the quantum Hamming bound, meaning that a set of $m$ Pauli errors can be approximately corrected so long as $mK \ll N$. This is the strongest bound known for any family of quantum error correcting codes (QECs), and continues a line of work showing that approximate QECs can significantly outperform exact QECs [LNCY97,CGS05,BGG24]. Our proof relies on a recent matrix concentration result of Bandeira, Boedihardjo, and van Handel [BBV23].
- Unified Framework for Quantum Code EmbeddingAndrew C. Yuan (University of Maryland, College Park)[abstract]Abstract: Given a Calderbank-Shor-Steane (CSS) code, it is sometimes necessary to modify the code by adding an arbitrary number of physical qubits and parity checks. Motivations may include concatenating codes, embedding low-density parity check (LDPC) codes into finite-dimensional Euclidean space, or reducing the weights of parity checks. During this embedding, it is essential that the modified code possesses an isomorphic set of logical qubits as the original code. However, despite numerous explicit constructions, the conditions of when such a property holds true is not known in general. Therefore, using the language of homological algebra, we provide a unified framework that guarantees a natural isomorphism between the output and input codes. In particular, we explicitly show how previous works fit into our framework.
- Tile codesVincent Steffan (IQM Germany); Shin Ho Choe (IQM Germany); Nikolas P. Breuckmann (Breuqmann Ltd.); Francisco Revson Fernandes Pereira (IQM Germany); Jens Niklas Eberhardt (Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz); Zijian Liang (Peking University); Yu-An Chen (Peking University)[abstract]Abstract: We introduce tile codes, a simple yet powerful way of constructing quantum codes that are local on a planar 2D-lattice. Tile codes generalize the usual surface code by allowing for a bit more flexibility in terms of locality and stabilizer weight. Our construction does not compromise on the fact that the codes are local on a lattice with open boundary conditions. Despite its simplicity, we use our construction to find codes with parameters [[288,8,12]] using weight-6 stabilizers and [[288,8,14]] using weight-8 stabilizers, outperforming all previously known constructions in this direction. Allowing for a slightly higher non-locality, we find a [[512,18,19]] code using weight-8 stabilizers, which outperforms the rotated surface code by a factor of more than 12. Our approach provides a unified framework for understanding the structure of codes that are local on a 2D planar lattice and offers a systematic way to explore the space of possible code parameters. In particular, due to its simplicity, the construction naturally accommodates various types of boundary conditions and stabilizer configurations, making it a versatile tool for quantum error correction code design.